Re: [PATCH] 'svn merge' should not lose indirect merge information
On Tue, 11 Jul 2006, Madan S. wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Jul 2006 02:11:21 +0530, Daniel Rall <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> >It would likely be more efficient if we could further conditionalize
> >re-parsing of the merge info based on whether any properties were
> >updated by the merge, or -- even better -- if the SVN_PROP_MERGE_INFO
> >property was updated. This might be able to be handled in conjunction
> >with the notification callback fixes.
> Will follow up on this.
Terrific, thanks Madan!
Received on Tue Jul 11 20:27:09 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev