Re: Should we stop shipping APR with 1.4.0-rcNEXT?

From: Peter Samuelson <peter_at_p12n.org>
Date: 2006-07-07 01:04:59 CEST

[Ben Collins-Sussman]
> I'm +1 on this as well, so long as we actually take the time to do a
> good job documenting and publicizing this decision. This means
> careful clarification of our INSTALL document, as well as announcing
> this change to package maintainers.

Speaking as a package maintainer [debian], please feel free to remove
apr, apr-util and neon at your earliest convenience. (:

application/pgp-signature attachment: Digital signature

Received on Fri Jul 7 01:05:40 2006

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Peter Samuelson: "Re: Creating a Debian Package for libsvn-javahl."
Previous message: Danny van Heumen: "Re: Tags"
In reply to: Ben Collins-Sussman: "Re: Should we stop shipping APR with 1.4.0-rcNEXT?"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ By Date ] [ By Thread ] [ By Subject ] [ By Author ] [ By messages with attachments ]