Re: Should we stop shipping APR with 1.4.0-rcNEXT?

On 7/6/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

> +1 to no longer shipping our dependencies in our tarball, but I'd note
> that we've discussed doing this for several releases now, and for whatever
> reason haven't managed it yet.
>
> I think one of the sticking points was the wish to continue shipping
> a with-deps version of the tarball. I don't think we should be doing
> that, personally - it adds extra complexity to the release process, and
> it's just odd anyway (we ship APR and Neon, but not zlib, BDB, or Serf).

+1 to not shipping a with-deps tarball.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jul 6 16:23:34 2006