[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Should we ship a newer version of APR with 1.4.0-rcNEXT?

From: Lieven Govaerts <lgo_at_mobsol.be>
Date: 2006-07-04 16:16:57 CEST

Quoting Erik Huelsmann <ehuels@gmail.com>:

> On 7/4/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:
> > So, Subversion 1.4.0-rc1 was built with APR 0.9.7. Given the bugs fixed
> > in APR since 0.9.7, should we consider building the next -rc with a
> > newer version (0.9.12?)
> Given that APR should be backward compatible, why not always ship with
> the newest?

The current RC1 doesn't even work on Windows, because the included neon-0.25.5
doesn't support apr 0.9.7, so either we upgrade apr or we downgrade neon to
0.24.7. See these mails for more info:

http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-06/0845.shtml (my report)
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-06/0718.shtml (Paul Burba's report)


This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Jul 4 16:17:44 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.