On 6/29/06, Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Jun 2006, Julian Foad wrote:
>
> > The "getopt" tests should be testing that command-line options are
> > basically recognised, so e.g. a sensible test would be that "svn --help"
> > produces output containing the words "usage" and "add" and "blame" and
> > "cat". What they currently do is check that the output matches exactly
> > what is recorded in a template file, except for a few specific
> > transformations. We have no requirement or intention that the help text
> > remain exactly the same from one version to the next, so we shouldn't be
> > testing for that.
>
> I too find this annoying.
+1
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 30 01:47:28 2006