Re: Agggh! 64-bit bug still present in 1.3.2 [PATCH]

On Thu, 22 Jun 2006, Toby Johnson wrote:

> David Summers wrote:
>>
>> OK, that patch fails when I applied it to a 32-bit system so we need
>> an %ifarch statement there. If you could do that and try it out and if it
>> works send that patch or tonight I can try to do that and send it to you
>> and then you could try it out and let me know. Either way is fine. If I
>> don't hear from you then I'll try to generate that tonight and send it out.
> Hi David,
>
> I'll work on getting that added; can you specify which part of the patch
> causes the failure? (Or what the failure message is...)
>

OK. False alarm, sorry. I must have done something wrong the first time
I applied the patch. I just re-applied it and compiled on CentOS4 and
everything compiled correctly this time. Wierd.

I'll do some more testing and then commit it to trunk. At that point we
can nominate it for back-port to 1.4.x and probably even 1.3.x.

Thanks for the patch!

-- 
David Wayne Summers        "Linux: Because reboots are for hardware upgrades!"
david_at_summersoft.fay.ar.us PGP Key: http://summersoft.fay.ar.us/~david/pgp.txt
PGP Key fingerprint =  0B44 B118 85CC F4EC 7021  1ED4 1516 5B78 E320 2001
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org