Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2
From: Paul Burba <paulb_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-06-23 19:23:51 CEST
rooneg@gmail.com wrote on 06/22/2006 10:49:26 AM:
> On 6/22/06, Paul Burba <paulb@softlanding.com> wrote:
Hi Garrett,
Thanks for taking a look.
> I just went through the diff, and it looks fine to me... I also built
Fixed that.
> Also, those tests print random stuff out to stdout when we have
By "have problems" do you mean printing a message and raising
e.g.:
# Checkout the standard greek repos into a directory that has a dir
expected_error = "svn: Failed to add file.*a non-file object of the " +
if not re.compile(expected_error).search(serr[0]):
Ok, assuming I'm understanding you correctly(?) I looked at all the
A) print 'some explanation of the error'
B) raise svntest.Failure('some explanation of the error')
Regardless of what's been done, where is the harm in providing a bit more
Anyhow, I'm not married to the additional message, but I'd prefer it if
FWIW I changed my patch to use approach B rather than A. I didn't realize
Paul B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.