Re: [PROPOSAL] Incomplete working copies (issue #695)

On 6/23/06, Madan U Sreenivasan <madan@collab.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 11:05:06 +0530, Eric Gillespie <epg@pretzelnet.org>
> wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose a new solution to this issue, and hopefully
> > get it into 1.5. What i'm really looking for is the kind of
> > flexibility Perforce has with its client specs in which parts of
> > a tree you check out.
>
> Why am I think we should keep "single file checkouts" in mind while doing
> this?

I believe that would just result with a directory with depth 0, and a
single file in it. So no other files would end up in it after an
update unless you explicitly asked for it.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 23 17:33:28 2006