[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB Fixes (was Re: svn commit: r20218 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_base/bdb svnserve)

From: D.J. Heap <djheap_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-06-23 16:00:36 CEST

On 6/23/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> On 6/23/06, D.J. Heap <djheap@gmail.com> wrote:
> > What're the chances of bundling a newer apr (like 0.9.12) and neon?
> > Is there some reason we are still bundling the old ones?
> I'd be in favor of bundling the latest APR releases from the 0.9.x branch
> > Are we going to bundle zlib now that it's required or are we going to
> > stop bundling dependencies completely sometime? It seems like that
> > has been discussed before but I'm not sure there was a consensus.
> I don't think bundling zlib should be necessary. It's available
> almost everywhere. We bundle APR/APR-Util and Neon because they're
> not always available, I don't think zlib fits in that category.

Ok. I don't have any strong feelings -- it just seemed odd to me.


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 23 16:01:15 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.