[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: BDB Fixes (was Re: svn commit: r20218 - in trunk/subversion: libsvn_fs_base/bdb svnserve)

From: D.J. Heap <djheap_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-06-23 15:50:57 CEST

On 6/23/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> On 6/23/06, David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> wrote:
[snip]
> > Is that kind of schedule okay? I realize that this introduces yet more
> > delay (until wednesday/thursday), but I'm afraid my exams need to come
> > before collecting sigs for Subversion. Also, I think that 48hrs to get
> > the sigs is realistic enough, with some prodding (volunteers?).
>
> I think it'll take at least a day or two to get sigs, so it seems ok
> to me. I'm more than willing to prod people into getting sigs in
> while you're not around ;-)
>

What're the chances of bundling a newer apr (like 0.9.12) and neon?
Is there some reason we are still bundling the old ones?

Are we going to bundle zlib now that it's required or are we going to
stop bundling dependencies completely sometime? It seems like that
has been discussed before but I'm not sure there was a consensus.

DJ

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 23 15:51:37 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.