C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
>> I'm now able to run 'make FS_TYPE=bdb svncheck' on my linux box with a
>> forking svnserve and there are no longer any failures. I know Branko
>> has some more work he's hoping to do here with regard to error
>> handling (see the comment about another potential pool destruction
>> ordering issue), but either way, this seems like an improvement, and I
>> think it should get merged into 1.4.x ASAP.
>>
>
> Well, pending committer review and approval, of course, then yes, it should
> get merged into 1.4.x.
>
>
>> If more fixes to this are going to happen in the next day or so, then
>> we should probably hold off on a new RC, but if not, then I'd say we
>> should cut a new RC with this fix in it, since clearly the RC1 tarball
>> is rapidly becoming out of date.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>
> If we know there are changes coming that are destined for 1.4.0, then
> there's no sense in rolling another RC until those changes are in. I mean,
> it ain't a "release candidate" if we know we wouldn't release it, right?
>
Very much so. I suggest we hold off with the next RC until Monday, I
expect i'll hack my way around the final bug (that I know of, heh) by then.
-- Brane
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Jun 23 07:53:13 2006