david@tigris.org wrote:
> Author: david
> Date: Fri Jun 9 16:42:13 2006
> New Revision: 20034
>
> Modified:
> trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch
> trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-8+/apr.patch
> trunk/packages/rpm/rhel-3/apr.patch
> trunk/packages/rpm/rhel-4/apr.patch
>
> Log:
> * packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch,
> packages/rpm/redhat-8+/apr.patch,
> packages/rpm/rhel-3/apr.patch,
> packages/rpm/rhel-4/apr.patch : Fix patch file broken in r19915. This fix
> allows the RPMs to build again.
>
>
>
> Modified: trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch
> URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch?pathrev=20034&r1=20033&r2=20034
> ==============================================================================
> --- trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch (original)
> +++ trunk/packages/rpm/redhat-7.x/apr.patch Fri Jun 9 16:42:13 2006
> @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> ---- configure.in (revision 17608)
> +--- configure.in (revision 20033)
> +++ configure.in (working copy)
> -@@ -52,8 +52,8 @@
> - dnl - APR_GSETID added
> - dnl - bug in apr_temp_dir_get() fixed
> +@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
> + dnl them. Only .7 and later can guarantee repository
> + dnl integrety with FSFS.
>
> --APR_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[5-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
> --APU_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[5-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
> +-APR_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[7-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
> +-APU_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[7-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
> +APR_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[4-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
> +APU_VER_REGEXES=["0\.9\.[4-9] 0\.9\.1[0-9] 1\."]
Umm... but the reason for requiring 0.9.7 was a dataloss one!
I.e., this is NOT a requirement to be trivially overridden without
considerable thought.
Max.
Received on Sun Jun 11 02:37:38 2006