>> Thanks Bhuvan! I've committed a modified version of your changes in
>> r20004. Please take a look at let me know what you think.
> The changes you did make this script look better. Thank you!
>> Support for ATOM seems like a laudable goal to me (though doesn't
>> necessarily match the script's name). What's the reasoning for
>> wanting to add support for older versions of RSS (e.g. do many clients
>> not yet offer support for RSS 2.0)?
> I wanted to support all type of RSS feeds. As you say, i understand it
> doesn't make more sense and we can add support for ATOM 1.0 alone. The
> current script name doesn't match it, so, as Malcolm suggested, i'll
> add a new script "svn2atom.py".
Hrm. Seems like all the feed types would have the same basic input needs.
Why not just rename the script to svnsyndicate.py or somesuch?
C. Michael Pilato <email@example.com>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Fri Jun 9 06:22:20 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev