[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: FSFS Issue...

From: John Szakmeister <john_at_szakmeister.net>
Date: 2006-06-01 02:17:21 CEST

[snip]
> That would be my preferred approach except for two problems. The first
> is that there's no clean way of doing it - we'd need to check for errors
> (and which errors?) at some boundary - exported functions in fs_fs.c,
> perhaps. The second problem is that APR < 0.9.7 doesn't report write
> errors _at all_ for buffered files, making this check less than useful.
> I'm loathe to implement this until we have a report with APR >= 0.9.7.

It appears someone was listening. Andrew MacKenzie on the users list just reported the problem:
  http://svn.haxx.se/users/archive-2006-05/1469.shtml

Vital stats:
  Windows 2003
  Apache 2.0.58 (which is bundled with APR 0.9.12, IIUC)
  Subversion 1.3.1 (which is bundled with APR 0.9.7)

I'm not sure how that works on Windows platforms (potentially having two different APR versions).

-John

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Jun 1 02:18:33 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.