Having trouble typing clearly today, it seems...
C. Michael Pilato wrote:
> Hyrum K. Wright wrote:
>>This patch fixes a bug where multiple --target switches fail silently
>>for all but the final one. Instead, this patch concatenates all targets
>>specified by multiple --target switches into one array.
>>Coincidentally, this patch also fixes a memory leak, since we were just
>>dropping the previous list of targets when we encountered additional
> Eh, we're still leaking memory with this patch because apr_array_append()
> doesn't reuse either of the arrays it's given as input. So it takes array A
> and B and makes a new C (wasting both A and B). If a third --targets comes
> along, it'll waste another pair of arrays. And so on. But we're only
> talking about an amount of memory proportional to the number of times
> --targets shows up as an option, and not alot of memory at that.
To clarify, it only wastes the memory needed for the array structure, not
> Still, if you know you're going to be wasting memory anyway, you can
> simplify the code like so:
> if (! opt_state.targets)
> opt_state.targets = apr_array_make(pool, 8, sizeof(const char *));
> opt_state.targets = apr_array_append(pool, opt_state.targets,
> "\n\r", TRUE,
And (duh), no need to allocate a spot for 8 members on the wasted array above.
C. Michael Pilato <firstname.lastname@example.org>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Wed May 31 23:16:42 2006