[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Problem with format of svn diff output

From: Mark Phippard <markp_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-05-26 02:16:33 CEST

Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> wrote on 05/25/2006 04:34:54 PM:

> On Wed, 24 May 2006, Ben Reser wrote:
>
> > On 5/24/06, Mark Phippard <markp@softlanding.com> wrote:
> > >It might be specific to the patches that they produce from Eclipse,
but
> > >the reason it works is that if you do an Add, then the old revision
has a
> > >date of 0 (1/1/1970). And if you are doing a Delete, the new
revision has
> > >a date of 0. So they are looking for the zero dates, and if neither
of
> > >them are zero they consider it a modfication.
> >
> > After some digging this is a CVS thing:
> > --- /dev/null 1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ dspam_train.1 24 Jan 2006 15:43:12 -0000 1.1
> >
> > That's how CVS shows adds. Note that they include the revision number
> > after the date so even CVS isn't strictly following the GNU docs I
> > linked to.
> >
> > Eclipse needs to just be smart and realize that not everyone uses the
> > same exact format here.
>
> +1

Eclipse corrected the problem.

Thanks

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri May 26 02:16:56 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.