Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> Michael Sweet writes:
> > Branko ?ibej wrote:
> > > ...
> > >> Were you planning to remove them outright? (If so, +1 from me).
> > >>
> > > Well, -1 to that, then, or we might as well remove the whole notes/
> > > directory. After all, who needs documented discussions?
> > > ...
> Documented discussions are very useful, but these images are very old
> and no one seem to be adding things in these areas. What do you need
> them for? I think it is just silly that one should have to wait for
> them everytime one checks out a new working copy for some reason. I'm
> not against images per se (despite what I said in my first mail:-),
> but these seem like cruft to me.
I feel a key point about why these should be removed is that they all
concern GUIs. I think I am correct in saying that there is an unspoken
consensus that any GUI would be a separate project, rather than an
integral part of the Subversion project. Therefore there is little point
in retaining examples of potential GUI design within the Subversion
Received on Wed May 24 17:39:11 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev