[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2006-05-16 15:04:19 CEST

Julian Foad <julianfoad@btopenworld.com> writes:

> "switch" is functionally similar to "update" so should generally
> support the same optional behaviours.

Agreed.

> But, going back to Philip's post above, the fact that two things share
> a lot of code is no reason at all to make decisions about their
> functional design or user interfaces. It may be that update (and
> switch) should support the "forced checkouts" behaviour, but why?

"update" is functionally similar to "checkout" so should generally
support the same optional behaviours :)

I can't see any reason for there to be a difference in behaviour.

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue May 16 15:04:51 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.