Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2

Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> wrote on 05/05/2006 06:18:37 PM:

> Paul Burba <paulb@softlanding.com> writes:
>
> > The original proposal was for svn co to tolerate obstructions by
default,
> > but eventually I decided to require the --force option.
>
> I think "checkout --force" is acceptable but I think the behaviour
> should be extended to "update --force" as well, after all, checkout
> and update share a lot of code.

Philip,

Agreed. Given it's similarities to update, should svn switch also support
--force?

Paul B.

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 15 15:12:46 2006