[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [Issue 2543] Inconsistent svn diff after rename

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2006-05-10 13:03:25 CEST

On 5/10/06, Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

> Unless there are two radically different use cases that I've been missing,

Yes, the two radically different use-cases for dealing with a file
that is schedule-add-with-history are

* "Show me exactly what's going to be sent into the repository."

* "Show me my local edits."

They are mutually exclusive behaviors, but both are legitimate things
you may want to do with a schedule-add-with-history file. One
behavior should be the default, and the other should be toggled by a
switch. At the moment, the 2nd behavior is all we do.

You make a good argument that the 1st behavior should be the default,
for the sake of consistency with other diff commands. If it's
changed, please at least make the 2nd behavior still triggerable

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed May 10 13:04:25 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.