Re: [PATCH] svn_client_blame3() and svn_opt_revision_working
On Mon, 08 May 2006, Daniel Rall wrote:
> On Mon, 08 May 2006, Peter N. Lundblad wrote:
> > > +1 on eventually adding support for this. Exactly how the changes are
> > > communicated to the user could use a little discussion. For example,
> > > do we say all WORKING changes were made by the user performing the
> > > 'blame' operation (which might not be true in the case of a shared
> > > WC), or do we use some generic text indicating that the changes are
> > > specific to the WC (e.g. "(local)")? What to we use in place of the
> > > revision?
> > This is already handled by cat. It adds an M to the revision number
> > and uses "(local)" for the user name. It uses the current mtime of
> > the file.
> Sounds like a good approach. I tweaked the log message to refer to
> 'cat' for a future change in behavior.
I've filed <http://subversion.tigris.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=2544>
to track the longer-term enhancment request.
Received on Mon May 8 23:17:28 2006
- application/pgp-signature attachment: stored
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev