[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2

From: Philip Martin <philip_at_codematters.co.uk>
Date: 2006-05-08 20:00:35 CEST

Paul Burba <paulb@softlanding.com> writes:

> Currently checkout reports paths only as 'A Added'. Update uses that
> too, as well as 'D Deleted', 'U Updated', 'C Conflict', and 'G Merged'.
> I can understand not wanting to reuse a letter/symbol from the first two
> columns of status (i.e. ' ', 'A', 'C', 'D', 'I', 'M', 'R', 'X', '?', '!',
> '~'). But must we really avoid using the letters from the other columns
> of status?

That was the consensus when we added 'K' for 'lock toKen' instead of
reusing 'L'.

> Maybe something completely new like "obstructed" or "blocked" is better?
> Though there isn't a good single letter for those if we avoid reusing any
> letters currently employed by status...'E' is the only choice.

'E' for 'already Exists'
'P' for 'adoPted'

Philip Martin
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon May 8 20:01:21 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.