"as for which the time stump of the checked-out file is not made to the time stump of an original file"

Me Observer registration is carried out at the project of subversion. It is
f_uno. I am a Japanese. Since I cannot do English at all, I hang the text
written in Japanese on translation software, and transmit. I am sorry although
I think unclear English.

Me It belongs to the team of the soft engineer who develops the software of
Windows. It turned to selecting the version management tool introduced into a
team this time. Since one are the engineers who perform software development,
the thing which can customize only for itself the future considers that they
are good. However, since time and a labor were applied to developing an
original tool from a place without anything too much, I thought that software
of an open source should just have been made at a base.

Then, me Although the meeting was attended in order to perform server
construction of subversion and to perform version management using this, a
large number encountered the dissenting opinion referred to as "Being unable to
introduce in the version control system which cannot keep an original time
stump" there. When a fruit is said, this portion is a portion which worried
myself. It is Windows although the men of a UNIX system may be unable to
understand. By the system, there is a custom in which an original time stump is
treated carefully. Since it is it, the opinion said like this has only complied
as a natural opinion.

I understand "There is a time stump of the file managed by subversion by
alternative of whether it grows into the time stump at the time of check-out,
or to grow into the time stump at the time of check-in, and it is not made to
the time stump of an original file." Please point out, supposing my
understanding is different.

With now Although there was only giving up introduction of subversion, I
thought, "Can't contact be taken with the men of the development team of
subversion?" With it It is a reason for having carried out observer
registration at the project of subversion.

Although it does not know whether the point "as for which the time stump of the
checked-out file is not made to the time stump of an original file" can call it
a problem, in the soft team to which I belong at least, adoption tends to be
rejected for reasons of this. Therefore, I wished to submit this point to the
men of a development team as a problem once.

although how to write in a problem previously was read -- first of all --
users@subversion.tigris.org It was understood that it was written so that
dev@subversion.tigris.org may be mailed. therefore --
dev@subversion.tigris.org is mailed. I am sorry when this is also my
misunderstanding. It corrects with translation software also for reading the
text currently written at Japanese, and is reading.

Thank you for your consideration.

--------------------------------------
Yahoo! JAPAN 10th Anniversary Special Feature
--- Enjoy Yahoo! Auction with Yahoo! Mail !! ---
http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/auction/

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org