Re: [PATCH]: Was [PROPOSAL] Takeover Take 2

> This is useful behaviour, and I think it's exactly the
> right behaviour for something labeled "checkout --force", but it should
> not be labeled "takeover".

The term "takeover" was not used to my knowledge in anything visible to a
user. Paul was just saying that he was using that term in describing his
patch, and perhaps within the patch comments.

The only place that it bleeds into what the user sees is in the output of
the checkout command. Paul proposed we used a 'T' to show when a file was
taken over. This would still be appropriate even if a separate command was
created someday, because in terms of that single file that is being
represented in the output, that is what happened.

Mark

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 6 21:28:05 2006