Re: peg-rev and checkout

Malcolm Rowe <malcolm-svn-dev@farside.org.uk> wrote:

>>> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-11/1293.shtml
>>>
>>> I agree with ghudson and rooneg in this thread. Checkout and blame
>>> are inconsistent with all the other commands.
>>
>> Malcolm pointed out that "checkout" is already fixed. What about
>> "blame"? If that's still to do, please file an issue.
>>
>
> Sorry, should have mentioned it in my earlier message: also done,
> see r18400.

Since we're at it, any chance "svn log" and/or "svn info" could grow peg-rev
support? Currently, the question "what happened to the file that was called
foo.c in r1234" can't easily be answered in any way, with the command line
client.

They'd be extremely useful to svnmerge.py as well, since it goes nuts if you
rename a branch now, and it just can't be fixed.

Giovanni Bajo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat May 6 00:50:21 2006