Re: peg-rev and checkout

On 5/3/06, Greg Hudson <ghudson@mit.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-05-03 at 21:34 -0500, Ben Collins-Sussman wrote:
> > Can someone explain what's going on here? If 'svn ls URL@1722' works,
> > why ever shouldn't 'svn co URL@1722' work just as well?
>
> I guess whoever implemented peg revs for "svn co" wasn't on board with
> the "operative rev defaults to peg rev" decision we've made on the list
> once or twice in the past.
>

Yes, we seem to have had this conversation last November, but nothing
came of it:

   http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-11/1293.shtml

I agree with ghudson and rooneg in this thread. Checkout and blame
are inconsistent with all the other commands.

I don't see why they couldn't be consistified... I don't see any
threat of 'breaking' existing behaviors that users are used to.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu May 4 05:23:28 2006