Separation of lock and needs-lock (was Atomicity of locks and needs-lock)
From: Edward Harvey <eharvey_at_chilsemi.com>
Date: 2006-04-30 00:31:47 CEST
> Also, because we don't necessarily agree that you shouldn't
This is primary goal #2 of locking-functional-spec.txt: "decrease the
The presence of a lock implies temporarily that any merge attempt would
The presence of the needs-lock property implies persistently that any
--- Whether a file is locked by some other user, or has the needs-lock property, it means that any changes are likely to be wasted time, and in either case it should be suggested to wait or obtain lock. In either case, the file should be read-only and the gui should display a gray icon. Only if you are willing to accept the fact that your changes are probably not commitable, should you then override the read-only bit, ignore the lock, and work on a file which is locked by someone else. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.orgReceived on Sun Apr 30 00:32:34 2006 |
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.