[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Atomicity of locks and needs-lock

From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2006-04-28 23:28:07 CEST

On 4/28/06, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> Edward Harvey wrote:
> > Would anybody object to, or favor this idea?
>
> I object.
>

What Mike said. For exactly those reasons.

The "needs-lock" property is a general preventative communication
mechanism. It's use is completely orthogonal to the actual act of
locking.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Apr 28 23:28:37 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.