Re: Atomicity of locks and needs-lock
From: Ben Collins-Sussman <sussman_at_red-bean.com>
Date: 2006-04-28 23:28:07 CEST
On 4/28/06, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
What Mike said. For exactly those reasons.
The "needs-lock" property is a general preventative communication
---------------------------------------------------------------------
|
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.
This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.