On 4/25/06, Peter N. Lundblad <peter@famlundblad.se> wrote:
> rooneg@tigris.org writes:
> > Author: rooneg
> > Date: Tue Apr 25 10:19:03 2006
> > New Revision: 19451
> >
> > Modified: trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/authz_tests.py
> > URL: http://svn.collab.net/viewvc/svn/trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/authz_tests.py?pathrev=19451&r1=19450&r2=19451
> > ==============================================================================
> > --- trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/authz_tests.py (original)
> > +++ trunk/subversion/tests/cmdline/authz_tests.py Tue Apr 25 10:19:03 2006
> > @@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
> > fp.close()
> >
> > def skip_test_when_no_authz_available():
> > - "skip this test on local repository"
> > - if svntest.main.test_area_url.startswith('file://'):
> > + "skip this test when authz is not available"
> > + if not svntest.main.test_area_url.startswith('svn://'):
> > raise svntest.Skip
> >
>
> Doesn't they work with tunneled svn protocol?
Does authz work at all over tunnelled svn? I thought that was one of
those cases where we didn't bother because you needed write access to
the repos files anyway...
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 25 19:43:06 2006