On 4/19/06, Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:
> Ivan Zhakov wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > There are my ideas for SoC:
> > * Store ACL in repository as special properties.
> > It's very usefull feature. For example in our company project leads
> > manages repository
> > access. Now they need go to some Samba share for edit acl file.
> >
> Well, I store the mod_authz_svn config file in the repository, restrict
> access to it, and arrange to automatically update changes to where the
> server expects to see it. Project leads just use SVN to update access
> rights, and it works just fine.
>
> Storing ACLs in the repository is a BIG job, if it's done correctly (and
> a -1 if it isn't ...). Definitely a lot bigger than C# bindings.
Ok. Agreed with you on this topic.
>
> > * .NET (C#) bindings.
> > I agree that it might too big for SoC, but initial level of bindings
> > for libsvn_client will be good.
> > There are some C# bindings around, but I consider Subversion should
> > have "official" .net
> > bindings.
> >
> So do you propose to duplicate AnkhSVN's work? AFAIK they have at least
> complete client-side C# bindings for Subversion.
AnkhSVN have made bindings for their purposes. They have separated
license, separated versioning and etc. Also they doesn't supported by
Subversion team. So nobody would use it.
>
> > * UI for shelves
> > Shelves is storing local changes in some private branch on server.
> > Many users asks for
> > that. And most slighting that Subversion actually have it, but it
> > hard to use:
> > http://geekswithblogs.net/flanakin/archive/2005/12/02/61929.aspx
> > http://blogs.vertigosoftware.com/teamsystem/archive/2006/01/18/Shelving_and_Branching.aspx
> >
> A "shelve" is a branch. So, instead of talking about a UI for shelves,
> I'd recommend implementing some of the ideas that came up during the
> discussion about using Subversion with the GCC repository.
>
I didn't see discussion about using Subversion with GCC repository.
What do you mean?
--
Ivan Zhakov
Received on Fri Apr 21 15:02:10 2006