Mark Phippard wrote:
> rooneg@gmail.com wrote on 04/17/2006 01:57:16 PM:
>
>
>>2) Fix nonrecursive checkouts. This is a bigger project, suitable for
>>someone who's already got some svn experience, if we have any that are
>>still students anyway ;-)
>
>
> Does anyone know what happened to this idea that breser floated? It
> seemed well thought out to me.
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2005-07/0398.shtml
My only complaint about the proposal is that there is a pretty cool (and I
think, useful) bit of functionality and CVS parity that we can get by just
going a step further. Instead of just a boolean excluded/included bit for
each entry, why not provide the ability to dictate the revision you'd like
to "stick" on for a given entry, and then allow SVN_INVALID_REVNUM (speaking
from an implementation perspective here, certainly not a UI one) mean "stick
this entry at a state of being excluded altogether"?
(For some reason, I thought this was already included in breser's proposal
... obviously I misremembered.)
--
C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet <> www.collab.net <> Distributed Development On Demand
Received on Fri Apr 21 07:00:58 2006