[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: Takeover Take 2 Was: Re: the 'takeover' feature

From: Molle Bestefich <molle.bestefich_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-04-18 16:13:13 CEST

Mark Phippard wrote:
> I would argue that we are not introducing any confusing behavior that
> will be hard to document.

Ok. Perhaps we could dumb it down a bit - not because anyone here is
dumb, but because testing the thesis would be the easiest way to end
this particular discussion.

I'd document "checkout" and "integrate" like this:
################
checkout)
Check out files from a repository into a new working copy.

integrate)
Convert local files to a working copy, given the URL of a repository
path that the local files are supposed to match.
################

Unless you think I'm being totally ridiculous, I'd appreciate if you
could show me how to clearly document your variant of checkout?

Hope I'm not too far out :-).

> I'd also hate to see this improvement get derailed again.

Of course, me too, I'm really sorry if it seems like that's what I'm
trying to do :-/.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 18 16:14:32 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.