[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: the 'takeover' feature

From: Paul Burba <paulb_at_softlanding.com>
Date: 2006-04-11 22:16:02 CEST

Hi All,

Just wondering what ever became of takeover...does it still have any life?
 As Mark has mentioned a few times in the thread, this would be very
helpful re Subclipse.

I'm glad to attempt any grunt work required to get Jonathan's old 1.2
patch caught up to trunk if that's all that's holding this up.

Please let me know, thanks,

Paul B.

kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net wrote on 09/16/2005 06:20:36 PM:

> Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> > Well, I'm not part of this consensus.
> >
> > I think checkout should tolerate existing directories by default. No
> > need for a flag for that. That should alleviate that Eclipse use
case.
>
> Yes -- in fact, I thought this was the conclusion we came to earlier
> (though the thread has been long, and I don't blame anyone for
> forgetting a later conclusion and backtracking to an earlier one).
>
> +1 on checkout just Doing The Right Thing when invoked over an
> existing local tree, by default. No need for a new switch here.
>
> -Karl

_____________________________________________________________________________
Scanned for SoftLanding Systems, Inc. and SoftLanding Europe Plc by IBM Email Security Management Services powered by MessageLabs.
_____________________________________________________________________________

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Apr 11 22:16:47 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.