On 4/7/06, David Anderson <david.anderson@calixo.net> wrote:
> In reply to the rest of the thread, dependancies were indeed removed,
> in a dual package offering (with deps and without), for 1.3.0-rc1 and
> rc2. The observed effect, as was discussed at the time, was that
> those two tarballs didn't gather 6 signatures within about a working
> week. We reverted to the previous offering for rc3 and later, and
> those gathered sigs in a more timely fashion.
I've seen you raise this point before, but I believe this is a
misunderstanding of our intended release processes. I don't believe
we should need three sigs on *each* file to release that file - we
should need at least three sigs *in total* to release. (The
assumption is that the RM has signed all of the files as he created
them.) Having as many sigs as possible is goodness, but we shouldn't
need every file signed 3 times to issue a release. That's way
overkill. -- justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Sat Apr 8 05:43:20 2006