Re: [svnmerge] question about the integrated and avail subcommands

Madan U S <madan@collab.net> wrote:

> Why do the 'svnmerge integrated' and 'svnmerge avail' commands require
a
> head option(in case the branch is tracked against more than one other
> branch)?
>
> Why cant it list the integrated and available options against all heads
> available?

"avail" is a remote operation that can take even several minutes on large
repositories, so I don't think we should be slower by default.
"integrated" is a local opeartion, so it'd make more sense, but there is a
consistency issue then.

-- 
Giovanni Bajo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org