On 4/4/06, Justin Erenkrantz <justin@erenkrantz.com> wrote:
> On 3/31/06, Garrett Rooney <rooneg@electricjellyfish.net> wrote:
> > work once I've had some time to play with some ideas. If we're gonna
> > change it, might as well see if we can incrementally improve some
> > stuff while we're messing with it.
>
> My pet peeve is that the paths to the editors must be relative to the
> root instead of relative to the parent dir. That annoys me to no
> end...
That would be awfully nice. I'll keep in in mind.
In other related news, I've been playing around with making an opaque
editor interface, and OMG is it a pain in the neck. All the function
names end up being ridiculously long, and the accessor functions are
worse, since either you have to typedef out individual callback types
for them, or you have to declare them inline, both options of course
suck, because their callbacks are either insanely long names or
insanely long declarations inline due to the number of arguments!
/me is starting to lean towards just making the thing public and
documenting that you MUST use the constructor...
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Apr 5 02:27:50 2006