Re: 1.3.1 tarballs up for testing/signing (Again)
Malcolm Rowe wrote on 3/29/2006 6:14 PM:
> On Wed, Mar 29, 2006 at 04:05:31PM +0100, Philip Martin wrote:
>> Sviatoslav Sviridov <email@example.com> writes:
>>> ==22561== Jump to the invalid address stated on the next line
>>> ==22561== at 0x44C0193: ???
>>> ==22561== by 0x40A3BB6: pool_clear_debug (apr_pools.c:1361)
>>> ==22561== by 0x40A3D1B: apr_pool_destroy_debug (apr_pools.c:1437)
>>> ==22561== by 0x40A3BA6: pool_clear_debug (apr_pools.c:1358)
>>> ==22561== by 0x40A3CAD: apr_pool_clear_debug (apr_pools.c:1411)
>>> ==22561== by 0x4023C1E: main (svn_test_main.c:315)
>>> ==22561== Address 0x44C0193 is not stack'd, malloc'd or (recently) free'd
>> Are you building against the apr/apr-util that come in the Subversion
>> tarball or are you using already installed apr/apr-util? If you are
>> using already installed apr/apr-util you might try rebuilding
>> apr/apr-util with --enable-pool-debug=yes.
> Isn't that what the apr_pool_clear_debug in the backtrace indicates?
I guess yes, because I use already installed apr/apr-util, and I've
rebuilt it with --enable-pool-debug=yes as Philip suggested.
Received on Wed Mar 29 17:18:44 2006
This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev