Re: static build was: 1.3.1 tarballs up for testing/signing (Again)

Johannes Holzer <hl-svn@arcor.de> writes:

> Thanks for your warning. I this case I will probably not need the static
> build. I'll check this....
> [...]

The tricky bit is that even when glibc is linked statically it may use
shared libraries to do things like name lookup and locale conversions.
A statically linked glibc often will work, but if the target machine
is sufficiently different from the build machine there can be
problems.

> i get the line . ../subversion-1.3.1-alpha/subversion/include/svn_version.h

The tarball unpacks as subversion-1.3.1, did you rename the source
directory? What value is defined for SVN_VER_PATCH in that file?

-- 
Philip Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org