Re: [PATCH] Further improve xdelta

On 3/24/06, Arlie Davis <adavis@stonestreetone.com> wrote:
> That seems to be an aesthetic reaction, which doesn't outweigh the real,
> measurable benefits of the performance work. I would prefer have to have
> this performance work checked in. Did you actually build both, and see a
> noticeable increase in binary size?
>

Justin's not objecting to binary size, he's objecting to additional
complexity in the code. That said, I suspect this is the kind of
place where a little extra complexity is worth it in return for the
speed gains. The xdelta code is very performance critical stuff.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 24 19:14:46 2006