Re: Ruby test failure

On 3/17/06, Kouhei Sutou <kou@cozmixng.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In <17434.30682.560335.263060@localhost.localdomain>
> "Re: Ruby test failure" on Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:48:26 +0100,
> "Peter N. Lundblad" <peter@famlundblad.se> wrote:
>
> > > I fixed the problem in r18924.
> >
> > Does this mean r18924 should be proposed for backport together with
> > the other swig 1.3.28 proposals and nominated for 1.3.2?
>
> I nominated r18924 for 1.3.1 and added reliance on r18924 to
> r17280 family.
>
> Should this move to 1.3.2 section? Is it too late?

Yes, all changes that were not merged into 1.3.1 should be moved into
the 1.3.2 section. It is too late for 1.3.1 because 1.3.1 has already
been rolled

Cheers,

David

--
David James -- http://www.cs.toronto.edu/~james
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org