[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: The (hopefully) final BDB-4.4 fix

From: C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato_at_collab.net>
Date: 2006-03-14 19:13:00 CET

kfogel@collab.net wrote:
> Branko Čibej <brane@xbc.nu> writes:
>>Thanks for the review and tests, everyone. I've committed this in
>>r18882, and the BDB-4.4-related changes should be complete now.
>>I've also updated STATUS for 1.3.x; please review and vote for r18144, etc.
> Thank you, Brane!
> I will review & vote. +1 on letting 1.3.2 out very soon after 1.3.1
> (within weeks, if we can), in order to get this change out to the
> public.
> Another strategy would be to release 1.4 soon, with these fixes and
> some new cancellation responsiveness (à la DannyB, though perhaps that
> should be "au DannyB") in the command-line client. The reason these
> two great tastes go great together is that raw-exit cancellation
> becomes more acceptable for file:// users if BDB is less sensitive to
> unplanned exits.
> Any thoughts on the merits of 1.3.2 vs 1.4 for your changes?

As I've stated in the past, I want us to run this code on svn.collab.net
*before* we release it to the public in a *final* tarball. There also
exists a policy (a soft one, one of our own making, but IMO a *good* one) of
only running publicly released code on svn.collab.net. Taken together, that
means Brane's work sees it first public release in 1.4.0-rc1, at which time
svn.collab.net and other folks who accept RCs for testing can start playing
with this code.

So, in terms of in which release to put this stuff:
   -1 on 1.3.2
   +1 on 1.4.0

C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net>
CollabNet   <>   www.collab.net   <>   Distributed Development On Demand

Received on Tue Mar 14 19:16:56 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.