[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: 1.3.1 tarballs up for testing/signing

From: David Anderson <david.anderson_at_calixo.net>
Date: 2006-03-14 17:18:35 CET

* C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> [2006-03-14 11:04:19]:

> Mark Phippard wrote:
> > I am just starting the testing process, but a couple of quick comments in
> > regards to the Windows zip file.
> >
> > 1) It is 700 K smaller than the 1.3.0 zip which seems odd.
> >
> > 2) It includes Neon 0.24.7 as opposed to 0.25.5. I see that 0.26.0 was
> > just released as well.
>
> Hrm. The gz and bz files have Neon 0.24.7, too. That seems ungood. But
> they aren't interestingly different size-wise from the 1.3.0 stuffs.

Damn. I'd looked up the version of Neon shipped with 1.3.0, not
remembering. And I picked up 0.24.7 in one of the files. But it's a
0.25.4.

Gaghh. Talk about a stupid, stupid way to burn a version number
:-(. If I remember the discussions about it all, next tarballs I post
are going to be 1.3.2 ?

So, report any other packaging errors you find. I'm investigating the
size discrepancy, but anything else that should go into the next
rolling, please notify.

the size difference for the zip seems to be coming from the apr*
bundles. In the 1.3.0 tarball, there are some directories which look
autogenerated, that aren't in 1.3.1: LibR, Release. There are also
more visual studio looking files in the root of all three libs.

- Dave, feeling mighty stupid.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Tue Mar 14 17:19:21 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.