Re: svn commit: r18804 - in branches/fs-atomic-renames/subversion: libsvn_fs_base tests/libsvn_fs

On 3/10/06, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:

> Oh, man, is that ugly. There's got to be a better way than crawling the
> changes table like that.

Oh, I agree completely. There's a reason it took me three days to
even come up with that solution, crawling the changes records didn't
even occur to me until I'd tried everything else. ;-)

> Perhaps the 'move' items in the "copies" table should grow destination
> paths? We could start storing them for new copies too, so that
> determining the target of a copy can be done in one step (if that path
> is available, of course) instead of looking up the target node-rev-id in
> the nodes table and reading its committed-path.

That sounds like it should work. I'll look into doing it that way today.

-garrett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Fri Mar 10 17:08:51 2006