[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [BUG] Manual conflict removal leads to spurious revert report

From: Ed Price <ed.price_at_gmail.com>
Date: 2006-03-08 14:34:47 CET

> This change can leave *reverted in an indeterminate state. That changed

Not really. This is not a public API and the function is only called from
svn_wc_revert2, which does initialize the reverted flag to FALSE.

> the behaviour of the function, since it always set *reverted to either
> TRUE or FALSE before (unless it returned an error). I haven't checked if
> that actually created problems, but I suspect it's wrong that *reverted
> never gets set to FALSE with this patch.

That's a reasonable concern but it is actually ok.

The previous code would overwrite the initial value, which isn't
necessarily correct either. Note that the comment on the function
says that it sets the flag *if something is reverted*. It does not say
that it sets the flag according to *whether something is reverted*.
So now the comment is correct :)

Thanks for reviewing! Any other comments?

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 8 14:36:17 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.