[svn.haxx.se] · SVN Dev · SVN Users · SVN Org · TSVN Dev · TSVN Users · Subclipse Dev · Subclipse Users · this month's index

Re: [PATCH] pre-update and pre-getfile hook

From: Mathias Weinert <mathias.weinert_at_gfa-net.de>
Date: 2006-03-01 09:54:00 CET

Referring to http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2006-02/0304.shtml Max Bowsher wrote:

> The efficiency implications are major, and the extreme inelegance of
> forcing the user to essentially do access control in two different ways,
> just because of details of Subversion's internals, is quite unpleasant.
> I realized I didn't have anything more productive to say than "This
> scares me. I won't be involving myself in this feature", and left the
> message well alone, hoping someone else would have something more useful
> to say about it.

I agree with you that now as we have per path access control for
svnserve these hooks aren't as important as they've been. But on
the other side they could be used for other things like logging,
preventing people from checking out too much (e. g. root) as
recently discussed in another thread or blocking certain IP

What exactly do you mean with "The efficiency implications are
major"? Would the hook significantly slow down things?


To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Mar 1 09:56:01 2006

This is an archived mail posted to the Subversion Dev mailing list.

This site is subject to the Apache Privacy Policy and the Apache Public Forum Archive Policy.