Re: Inexcusable BDB upgrade triple blunder

On 2/27/06, Branko Èibej <brane@xbc.nu> wrote:

> So ... any bright ideas?

How about the following hare-brained scheme:

Have the BDB env handles and filesystem objects both store pointers to
each other, so the first one that has a pool cleanup fire can NULL out
the pointers that refer to it? That way the second one to fire can't
get back to the free'd memory.

-garrett
Received on Tue Feb 28 07:09:27 2006