Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk> writes:
> A lot of the above is discussed in notes/wc-improvements (that file is
> a little out-of-date since some of the property handling has already
> been implemented).
>
> I think caching the size of the unmodified working file would be a
> good thing. However if we stop doing a translation and byte-by-byte
> comparison we need to consider what happens when "modifications"
> disapear, e.g if I modify an expanded keyword and the file shows up as
> modified then what, if anything, gets committed if the file has no
> modifications when converted back to repository form?
Indeed. I just checked to make sure notes/wc-improvements mentioned
that, and it turns out lundblad added it in r18530, probably as a
result of this thread.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 27 20:26:26 2006