Re: problem revealed by issue #2398 (server-side assertion)

Greg Hudson <ghudson@MIT.EDU> writes:
> I object to the entire sense of the commit, personally. I think
> svn_fs_merge should be demanding that the two root objects come from the
> same in-memory FS object (something you can check with an assert), and
> it's only a coincidence that neither back end puts much information in
> the in-memory FS object and thus doesn't really care. If mod_dav_svn is
> not obeying this constraint, then the bug is in mod_dav_svn.

Why?

An answer like "A vague, inarticulable sense of style" is fine, I just
wanted to know if you have some specific reason why the two FS objects
should be the same object.

-Karl

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Mon Feb 27 20:09:41 2006