Daniel Rall <dlr@collab.net> writes:
> Karl, do you have any objections to restoring the link to the
> summit.html doc down in the list of links? Though the content should
> be merged into the Requirements doc, preserving the linkage to the
> original documents for posterity's sake seems reasonable, on the
> grounds that someday developers may wonder where even unsurprising
> requirements came from (or which user segments they apply to).
Well, it's still linked to from elsewhere in the requirements. I
agree the provenance should remain visible, just not sure it need
remain prominent... (?)
-Karl
> On Fri, 17 Feb 2006, kfogel@tigris.org wrote:
> ...
> > --- trunk/www/merge-tracking/requirements.html (original)
> > +++ trunk/www/merge-tracking/requirements.html Fri Feb 17 01:17:53 2006
> ...
> > @@ -28,8 +26,15 @@
> >
> > <div id="requirements">
> >
> > -<p style="color: red">TODO: Incorporate CollabNet Summit findings.
> > -Remove redundancies.</p>
> > +<p style="color: red">*** UNDER CONSTRUCTION ***</p>
> > +
> > +<p style="color: red">TODO:
> > +Incorporate CollabNet Summit findings into
> > +the material below. There is a lot of data in those findings not
> > +reflected below. For the most part the summit results are not
> > +surprising, but they represent the best writeup we have of certain
> > +requirements that were formerly only hinted at tangentially on the
> > +users@ list and in other forums.</p>
> ...
> > @@ -216,9 +221,6 @@
> > functional/design spec pages.</p>
> >
> > <ul>
> > - <li><a href="summit.html">CollabNet Enterprise customer summit on
> > - Merge Tracking</a></li>
> > -
> > <li><a
> > href="http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/notes/schema-tradeoffs.txt"
> > >schema-tradeoffs.txt</a>: Search for the section called "Questions
--
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Thu Feb 23 21:32:42 2006