Would it be possible, instead, to make long-running operations run at a
lower priority than short-running operations?
I'm a newcomer to SVN design, so this really is a question, and not a
suggestion.
-- arlie
-----Original Message-----
From: rooneg@gmail.com [mailto:rooneg@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Garrett Rooney
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 5:02 PM
To: C. Michael Pilato
Cc: Jim Blandy; dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Ways to keep users from checking out too much.
On 2/22/06, C. Michael Pilato <cmpilato@collab.net> wrote:
> Garrett Rooney wrote:
>
> > Honestly, I don't care one way or another if they can --force it or
> > not. Checking out trees that large puts an unacceptable amount of
> > strain on a public resource in this case, I just want to be able to
> > stop them from making silly mistakes that require administrator
> > effort to block, and reserve the admin effort for the cases where
> > people are actually doing this kind of thing on purpose. If they
> > can add --force and make it work, that's nice, but it's not really a
showstopper IMO.
>
> Um... aren't you the guy that just implemented the equivalent of
> 'svnadmin dump' over the RA layer? Does that not generate a similar
> level of system strain?
Sure, but that's actually less strain than the way people were doing the
same thing before I implemented that. It's more effort to do the job via
diff than via replay ;-)
-garrett
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Received on Wed Feb 22 23:11:19 2006